The recent tax case of Leigh Jacques v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 311 (TC) considered whether ignorance can indeed be accepted as a reasonable excuse. While only an appeal of a Sch 41 Failure to Notify penalty of £250 in relation to High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC), the case was decided in the appellant’s favour, and should be noted by HMRC. In my view, it presents a very well explained decision by Justice Nigel Popplewell (JNP).
A summary of the notable points are:
In summary, ignorance of the law can constitute a reasonable excuse. This is also demonstrated in other cases for example what para 82 said in Perrin and the decision in the Clean Car Co [1991] VATTR 234.
I believe this recent case will assist practitioners in defending penalties where the taxpayer was unaware of a statutory requirement. For example, we’ve seen unprecedented use by HMRC of Schedule 18 of Finance (No. 2) Act 2017 Failure to Correct penalties, where HMRC officers have steadfastly maintained it’s not an excuse to be ignorant of the 30 September 2018 Requirement to Correct deadline. Buzzacott is currently challenging HMRC’s position on this with HMRC’s safeguards committee.
Buzzacott has built a reputation for defending clients against HMRC penalty action, either through HMRC withdrawing penalty action or varying the amount of penalty in the clients’ favour. Our expert knowledge of HMRC’s policy and procedures mean that our clients receive expert penalty mitigation advice and thus regularly avoid unnecessary penalties.
Call us today on +44 (0)20 7710 3389 or fill in the form below and a member of our team will be in touch. All communications are in the strictest confidence.