
News – 13.03.25
Electronic Sales Suppression (ESS) Campaign
HMRC is ramping up action on ESS tool users. Stay updated on key developments, impacts, and necessary next steps for you or your clients. … Read more
Insight – 10.03.25
Essential COFA tips for stronger financial compliance
All SRA law firms need a COFA, but smaller firms may find the role challenging. Here are key insights to help navigate it. … Read more
Upcoming event – 22.05.25
Charity SORP update webinar
Book to attend our Charity SORP update webinar today … Read more
Find us quickly
130 Wood Street, London, EC2V 6DL
enquiries@buzzacott.co.uk T +44 (0)20 7556 1200
While the majority of HMRC investigations are conducted on a civil basis, HMRC also possesses the power to conduct criminal investigations. As a rule of thumb, HMRC will only conduct a criminal investigation when it believes that:
Once HMRC has conducted its investigations, if it concludes that it has sufficient evidence to support a prosecution, it will send its case to the CPS. It’s ultimately the CPS who make the decision to proceed with prosecution and take the case to trial. Invariably, the CPS makes its decision on whether to proceed having only reviewed the evidence presented by HMRC. If this feels a little one-sided, it’s because it is!
As anyone who has ever worked in justice will know, going to trial can be extremely expensive and the eventual outcome, often uncertain. Recently, Buzzacott have been engaged by several leading firms of solicitors who have sought to reduce the risk of high costs and unpredictable nature of going to trial, by taking proactive steps to persuade the CPS that the case does not merit being taken to trial.
Buzzacott’s Head of Tax Investigations & Dispute Resolution team, Mark Taylor, has recently received instructions from solicitors to review the technical and behavioural merits of HMRC’s case, before delivering a report to the CPS, providing Mark’s own view on the strength of HMRC’s position. For 20 years of his career, Mark worked for HMRC where he served as a fully trained Senior Inspector of Taxes, a Criminal Investigator and a Parts 2, 4 & 8 Proceeds of Crime Act Accredited Financial Investigator. His credentials speak for themselves, and whenever the CPS receive a report with Mark’s name on it, they’re forced to re-evaluate whether HMRC’s case is as robust as has been presented by HMRC itself.
In the last two years, Buzzacott have been engaged by solicitor’s to prepare reports for the CPS in respect of HMRC criminal investigations into 10 separate individuals. The CPS has elected not to proceed with prosecution in respect of 8 of those 10 individuals. Our report for the remaining two was sent to the CPS in September of this year, and it’s anticipated that the CPS will not confirm its decision until 2022.
Buzzacott is extremely proud of our 100% record with our reports to the CPS. If you have a client who is facing criminal prosecution, please do not hesitate to contact us. The earlier we get involved, the more time we have to identify the flaws in HMRC’s case, and to present a robust report, which gives your clients the best, most cost-effective opportunity to maintain their liberty.
While the majority of HMRC investigations are conducted on a civil basis, HMRC also possesses the power to conduct criminal investigations. As a rule of thumb, HMRC will only conduct a criminal investigation when it believes that:
Once HMRC has conducted its investigations, if it concludes that it has sufficient evidence to support a prosecution, it will send its case to the CPS. It’s ultimately the CPS who make the decision to proceed with prosecution and take the case to trial. Invariably, the CPS makes its decision on whether to proceed having only reviewed the evidence presented by HMRC. If this feels a little one-sided, it’s because it is!
As anyone who has ever worked in justice will know, going to trial can be extremely expensive and the eventual outcome, often uncertain. Recently, Buzzacott have been engaged by several leading firms of solicitors who have sought to reduce the risk of high costs and unpredictable nature of going to trial, by taking proactive steps to persuade the CPS that the case does not merit being taken to trial.
Buzzacott’s Head of Tax Investigations & Dispute Resolution team, Mark Taylor, has recently received instructions from solicitors to review the technical and behavioural merits of HMRC’s case, before delivering a report to the CPS, providing Mark’s own view on the strength of HMRC’s position. For 20 years of his career, Mark worked for HMRC where he served as a fully trained Senior Inspector of Taxes, a Criminal Investigator and a Parts 2, 4 & 8 Proceeds of Crime Act Accredited Financial Investigator. His credentials speak for themselves, and whenever the CPS receive a report with Mark’s name on it, they’re forced to re-evaluate whether HMRC’s case is as robust as has been presented by HMRC itself.
In the last two years, Buzzacott have been engaged by solicitor’s to prepare reports for the CPS in respect of HMRC criminal investigations into 10 separate individuals. The CPS has elected not to proceed with prosecution in respect of 8 of those 10 individuals. Our report for the remaining two was sent to the CPS in September of this year, and it’s anticipated that the CPS will not confirm its decision until 2022.
Buzzacott is extremely proud of our 100% record with our reports to the CPS. If you have a client who is facing criminal prosecution, please do not hesitate to contact us. The earlier we get involved, the more time we have to identify the flaws in HMRC’s case, and to present a robust report, which gives your clients the best, most cost-effective opportunity to maintain their liberty.
For a completely free, no obligation discussion as to how Buzzacott might be able to assist your clients, please do not hesitate to contact us.
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We’d also like to set optional analytics and marketing cookies. We won't set these cookies unless you choose to turn these cookies on. Using this tool will also set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.
For more information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.
Please be aware:
— If you delete all your cookies you will have to update your preferences with us again.
— If you use a different device or browser you will have to tell us your preferences again.
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytics cookies help us to understand how visitors interact with our website by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.