News – 18.11.24
International Men's Day - breaking the silence around men's mental health
International Men's Day - breaking the silence around men's mental health … Read more
Insight – 20.11.24
A change in US Presidency: How might it affect your finances?
In this article, we explore the potential economic and financial impacts of Donald Trump's return to power. … Read more
Upcoming event – 10.12.24
Funding innovation in the technology sector: Are the government doing enough?
Join us for an exclusive roundtable breakfast to explore the question of whether the government are doing enough to support innovation in the technology sector. … Read more
Find us quickly
130 Wood Street, London, EC2V 6DL
enquiries@buzzacott.co.uk T +44 (0)20 7556 1200
The joint statement on the implementation of prudential reforms, contained in the Financial Services Bill, also indicates a revised implementation date of the Capital Requirements Regulation 2 (CRR2).
The FCA published its discussion paper (DP20/2) in June 2020 on the proposed requirements of IFPR, and this was originally expected to be implemented, in line with the European equivalent regime IFR/IFD, on 26 June 2021. The delay in IFPR’s introduction will be welcomed by many firms as they continue to grapple with the uncertainties surrounding the end of the Brexit transition period, the impact of COVID-19 and the wider markets, and the general volume of recent regulatory reform.
However, this delay may have implications for some firms with entities regulated in both the UK and the EU. Due to the different implementation dates, the UK and EU will effectively be regulating under two different regimes for most of the second half of 2021. While the initial intention was for these two legislations to be closely aligned, the additional delay could result in a divergence of the core initiatives of a new prudential regime.
Over the last six months, the FCA has conducted a number of surveys, most of which focus on performance in light of the ongoing pandemic. The latest survey, however, seeks feedback on the cost benefit analysis of the IFPR, and requires firms to provide routinely reported information, such as staff numbers and remuneration, as well as financial data relating to the new K-factor requirements, for which most firms would not have had to report before.
Although the implementation date may now be just over a year away, the FCA are already expecting firms to start preparing for the new regulation, sooner rather than later, and take advantage of the extension to prepare themselves for the potential impact of IFPR on their business.
As a quick reminder, assessment of the impact of the new regime should include the following key actions:
For more information on the new regime please refer to our previous articles published earlier this year:
The joint statement on the implementation of prudential reforms, contained in the Financial Services Bill, also indicates a revised implementation date of the Capital Requirements Regulation 2 (CRR2).
The FCA published its discussion paper (DP20/2) in June 2020 on the proposed requirements of IFPR, and this was originally expected to be implemented, in line with the European equivalent regime IFR/IFD, on 26 June 2021. The delay in IFPR’s introduction will be welcomed by many firms as they continue to grapple with the uncertainties surrounding the end of the Brexit transition period, the impact of COVID-19 and the wider markets, and the general volume of recent regulatory reform.
However, this delay may have implications for some firms with entities regulated in both the UK and the EU. Due to the different implementation dates, the UK and EU will effectively be regulating under two different regimes for most of the second half of 2021. While the initial intention was for these two legislations to be closely aligned, the additional delay could result in a divergence of the core initiatives of a new prudential regime.
Over the last six months, the FCA has conducted a number of surveys, most of which focus on performance in light of the ongoing pandemic. The latest survey, however, seeks feedback on the cost benefit analysis of the IFPR, and requires firms to provide routinely reported information, such as staff numbers and remuneration, as well as financial data relating to the new K-factor requirements, for which most firms would not have had to report before.
Although the implementation date may now be just over a year away, the FCA are already expecting firms to start preparing for the new regulation, sooner rather than later, and take advantage of the extension to prepare themselves for the potential impact of IFPR on their business.
As a quick reminder, assessment of the impact of the new regime should include the following key actions:
For more information on the new regime please refer to our previous articles published earlier this year:
Please get in touch to speak to an expert and get further clarification or assistance with these changes.
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We’d also like to set optional analytics and marketing cookies. We won't set these cookies unless you choose to turn these cookies on. Using this tool will also set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.
For more information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.
Please be aware:
— If you delete all your cookies you will have to update your preferences with us again.
— If you use a different device or browser you will have to tell us your preferences again.
Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Analytics cookies help us to understand how visitors interact with our website by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.